tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3637605010144131610.post5926484339174670243..comments2022-03-29T07:16:31.833-07:00Comments on About Intelligence: How difficult is Vision?Hugo Penedoneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02746022526894210415noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3637605010144131610.post-34957392144276146242008-05-15T05:16:00.000-07:002008-05-15T05:16:00.000-07:00Hello Hugo, nice blog.I see vision as a complex as...Hello Hugo, nice blog.<BR/><BR/>I see vision as a complex as needed data aquisition system.<BR/><BR/>Based on the needed detail about your environment, evolution made you with a bettor or poor vision.<BR/><BR/>If you need to identify all little details about your environment you should have a huge internal aggregated "catalogue" (memory). This catalogue is multidimensional and aggregate forms smells, feelings, etc etc over one notion and should have several levels in each dimension. (a cat has legs, legs have nails, etc). I see this catalogue as data warehouse house like system ( you can use SAP BW for that eheh) <BR/><BR/>On top of this catalogue you have reasoning (don’t know scientific term) and the information should flow in both directions, you use the catalogue to decisions (intelligent or not) and based on the output you adapt this catalogue. <BR/><BR/>“can a mouse tell if there is a cat in a picture or not”<BR/><BR/>I think yes, it has enough good vision to identify a shape as a “cat” and it’s native reasoning tell him to do a lot of task, but this part is no vision anymore. <BR/><BR/>“I guess that these neuronal systems, much simpler than the human brain, are able to solve tasks that we have not yet achieved with Computer Vision algorithms”<BR/><BR/>I guess that too because animals vision “algorithm” should not be static, it evolutes, based on the evolution of that “catalogue” feeded by others data acquisition systems.<BR/><BR/>Be cool dude Luís Pereirahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04232475626192949929noreply@blogger.com